Grad Fellow Notes: The Impact of “No Impact” Evaluations

enter essay on schools https://eagfwc.org/men/preparacion-viagra-casero/100/ megapharmnorx le viagra pour qui free reseach papers cialis nps source url essays english viagra stories forum being right does not always help one make friends essay do my philosophy homework get link viagra canada cheap viagra for sale in france efecto viagra sandia order levitra uk white paper sample go to link viagra uk delivery viagra pfizer online writing article reviewsВ follow link go cytotec venta online usa testimonials viagra cialis levitra phillis wheatley essay https://eagfwc.org/men/viagra-headaches-cure/100/ source link https://naturalpath.net/natural-news/ordercialis-by-check/100/ how to write a report for research project https://www.platinumed.com/mentrial/cialis-free-sample/29/ With the steady rise of the number of impact evaluations (IEs) per year, it should come as no surprise that not every single IE will show a positive impact. The authors of “no impact” evaluations will understandably be worried that their work will not be academically published nor be used for public policy. There is, however, still value in such information. Evidence that a particular program does not work paves the way for alternative interventions to happen. Licona (2017) provides several examples where null results in Mexican education programs encouraged the tweaking of aspects such as selection criteria, consolidation of redundant programs, and budget optimization.

By |2020-05-28T13:39:25-04:00July 24th, 2017|Blog Post, Graduate Fellow, RCT, Research|Comments Off on Grad Fellow Notes: The Impact of “No Impact” Evaluations